H 95° L 73°
  • clear-night
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 95° L 73°
  • clear-day
    Sunny. H 95° L 73°
  • clear-day
    Sunny. H 96° L 73°

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00


Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00


Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

Botanical battle: Woman suing Tulsa after city crews destroy plants

Botanical battle: Woman suing Tulsa after city crews destroy plants

Botanical battle: Woman suing Tulsa after city crews destroy plants
Photo Credit: Russell Mills
Denise Morrison's yard, full of edible and medicinal plants, a few months after the city of Tulsa removed hundreds of them claiming a violation of the city's nuisance ordinance

Botanical battle: Woman suing Tulsa after city crews destroy plants

In a case that has garnered international attention, sparked a petition drive and outraged some, a Tulsa woman has sued the city for destroying thousands of plants she used for food and medicine.

The city told her the plants violated a municipal nuisance ordinanance.

Denise Morrison has filed suit in federal court, seeking monetary damages for more than $10,000 worth of plants she says the city arbitrarily decided to destroy on two properties she owns.

She tells KRMG the dispute actually began nearly six years ago, when city crews "mowed" a two-acre property she owns near N. 46th St. and Lewis Ave.

They took the action the day after she had planted the entire lot, clearly, she says, with plants, not weeds.

After years of wrangling over that action she was ordered to pay the city another $1,000 to cover the cost of the mowing, or lose the property.

Only employed part-time, with a recently deceased son and an elderly mother for whom she cares, it took donations from friends and neighbors to save her land.

Morrison says she was given from 5 p.m. one day until 8 a.m. the next morning to come up with the money.

A month after finally settling, the city showed up at her home, in the 500 block of 49th Pl. North.

She tells KRMG she had checked with the city to make sure everything she was growing at her home was legal.

"They sent me a report back telling me I had no violations," she said. "I wanted to make sure that it wasn't a problem. But after they forced me to pay $1,000 last year to save my property, the very next month they came here."

She called police, she says, and the officer gave her a summons to go to court.

"I went to court August 15th, the judge said we're gonna recommend it over to October court. Okay, come back in October. August 16th, that morning, they had trucks lined up out here."

They told her, "We're gonna take out all of this."

"No you're not," she says she replied. "I'm gonna sue you."

True to their word, the crews removed lemon mint, apple mint, Rose o'Sharon, stinging nettles and even 35-year-old Concord grapes.

All her plants, she says, are grown completely organically, with no pesticides or commercial fertilizer.

They are all edible, and many medicinal.

KRMG contacted the City of Tulsa for a response. Spokeswoman Michelle Allen responded via email.

"This matter you are referencing is now pending litigation in federal court and I am not at liberty to comment at this time."

She did send a copy of the city's nuisance ordinance.

It contains verbiage which would seemingly exempt many, if not all, the plants destroyed on Morrison's property.

The pertinent passage to the ordinance (which is attached as a related link above):

6. Weeds and other rank growths of vegetation upon private property or
adjoining parking, including but not limited to poison ivy, poison oak, or poison sumac
and all vegetation at any state of maturity which:
a. Exceeds twelve (12) inches in height, except healthy trees, shrubs,
or produce for human consumption grown in a tended and cultivated
garden unless such trees and shrubbery by their density or location
constitute a detriment to the health, benefit and welfare of the public and
community or a hazard to traffic or create a fire hazard to the property or
otherwise interfere with the mowing of said weeds;
b. Regardless of height, harbors, conceals, or invites deposits or
accumulation of refuse or trash;
c. Harbors rodents or vermin;
d. Gives off unpleasant or noxious odors;
e. Constitutes a fire or traffic hazard; or
f. Is dead or diseased

Morrison maintains her plants were for human consumption, constituted no health hazard, was kept clean of trash and did not harbor any vermin.

Online petitions seeking a reversal of the city's stance and the replacement of her plants are circulating, and websites around the world have taken note of the story.

Read More

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • As President Donald Trump again defended his Supreme Court nominee, federal appeals court judge Brett Kavanaugh, Senators in both parties waited Tuesday to see if Kavanaugh’s accuser would agree to testify at a hearing set for next week, after accusing him of sexual misconduct back when the two were teenagers in the 1980’s. “Dr. Ford’s lawyers refuse to respond to our invitations to participate,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), as questions seemed to be raised about whether a politically explosive hearing would take place next Monday as scheduled. Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee said staffers had spoken with Judge Kavanaugh on Monday about the charge that he tried to sexually assault Dr. Christine Blasey Ford at a high school party. “We’ve also called and emailed Dr. Ford’s lawyer to arrange a similar interview, but we haven’t received a response,” the committee reported, as Senators didn’t seem to know whether Ford would testify. Sen. John Cornyn: 'So far, Dr. Ford's lawyers refuse to respond to invitations to participate in a bipartisan process … if she'd prefer to do this in a closed setting, that's her choice, but we've offered her basically, either an open or closed setting' https://t.co/7SVVRAuCJY pic.twitter.com/3c5XQEJlOU — ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) September 18, 2018 If Ford decides to appear on Capitol Hill next week, Republicans said they were ready to go forward. “She’s going to have an opportunity to be heard,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. At the White House, President Trump defended Kavanaugh several times, again chiding Democrats for bringing the allegations forward after hearings on Kavanaugh had ended, and just days before a scheduled vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I feel so badly for him that he’s going through this, to be honest with you,” the President said at a joint news conference with the President of Poland. “It should have been brought up long ago,” Mr. Trump said of Ford’s charge from 36 years ago. “And that’s what you have hearings for. You don’t wait until the hearing is over and then, all of a sudden, bring it up.” As for Democrats, they stood by Ford and her explosive allegation. “In my view, Professor Ford is telling the truth,” said Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer. During every step of this process, I’ve found every single piece of information from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford eminently credible, sincere and believable. She knew this would have a huge effect on her life and she was incredibly brave to come forward. — Sen Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) September 18, 2018 “The FBI background investigation into Judge Kavanaugh should be reopened in light of the serious charges against him,” said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). But as Senators left town for the week, they headed home unsure as to whether Ford would be on Capitol Hill for testimony next Monday. While Democrats called for a full FBI review of Ford’s claim, there was some discussion among Republicans that if Ford refuses to testify in person – then the GOP might just move next week to confirm Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. “Hopefully, the woman will come forward, state her case,” the President said.
  • DNA evidence led homicide detectives to an Oklahoma inmate after the death of 43-year-old Amy Robertson in 2017. Robertson's body was found in a dumpster after employees at Las Americas Restaurant in east Tulsa noticed blood. Detectives announced the arrest of Dennis John Kurtz Jr. on Tuesday. An affidavit shows another rape victim reported that Kurtz said “I’m a murderer” during her rape.  The information helped police connect the dots. The DNA from that case matched DNA from the Robertson case. Kurtz was already in prison for the other rape case. 
  • A school-based survey shows nearly 1 in 11 U.S. students have used marijuana in electronic cigarettes, heightening health concerns about the new popularity of vaping among teens. E-cigarettes typically contain nicotine, but many of the battery-powered devices can vaporize other substances, including marijuana. Results published Monday mean 2.1 million middle and high school students have used them to get high. Vaping is generally considered less dangerous than smoking, because burning tobacco or marijuana generates chemicals that are harmful to lungs. But there is little research on e-cigarettes’ long-term effects, including whether they help smokers quit. The rise in teenagers using e-cigarettes has alarmed health officials who worry kids will get addicted to nicotine, a stimulant, and be more likely to try cigarettes. Last week, the Food and Drug administration gave the five largest e-cigarette makers 60 days to produce plans to stop underage use of their products. Nearly 9 percent of students surveyed in 2016 said they used an e-cigarette device with marijuana, according to Monday’s report in the journal JAMA Pediatrics. That included one-third of those who ever used e-cigarettes.
  • Approving a deal worked out by Congressional negotiators, the Senate on Tuesday okayed a compromise package which funds the Pentagon, along with money for major domestic health programs in 2019, as lawmakers will leave a chunk of other federal agencies on a temporary spending plan that lasts into early December. The $712 billion in funding for military operations was paired with funding for popular research agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control, and includes extra money to fund work on the opioids epidemic. “We are making real progress here,” said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby. The bill is expected to be approved next week by the House, which would mean that Congress will have completed five of the 12 federal government funding bills before the new fiscal year begins on October 1. Chairman @USRepRodney: In addition to the FY19 Defense and Labor-HHS funding bills, the conference report includes a Continuing Resolution through December 7, 2018, to allow Congress to complete work on the remaining Appropriations bills. — House Appropriations (@HouseAppropsGOP) September 13, 2018 The bill adds almost $20 billion to the military for 2019 over this year, part of the push by Republicans and the Trump Administration to add extra funding for the military. Democrats were also successful in getting extra money for a number of domestic priorities, like an extra $2 billion for research on cancer and Alzheimer’s, and $6.7 billion to deal with opioid abuse. The bill also includes a 1.9 percent pay raise for civilian workers of the Defense Department and the other domestic agencies funded in this bill, which would free them from a threat by the President to cancel a scheduled pay increase for federal workers in 2019. Members of the armed services would do a little better, getting a pay raise in 2019 of 2.6 percent. “It’s a product of hard work and bipartisan cooperation,” said Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who said lawmakers are still negotiating the other unfinished bills – as Congress is on course to do the most spending work before the fiscal year deadline in many years. But, Congress still won’t be finished with all the spending bills by October 1, requiring a stop gap budget to be approved next week, and signed by the President. Since the House and Senate reformed the budget process in 1974, lawmakers have only finished their spending work on time in 1976, 1988, 1994 and 1996. Heading to the Senate floor now to vote against the “continuing resolution.” Congress has used a CR to throw in the towel instead of doing its job over 180 times. This is UNACCEPTABLE. We need a budget process that actually works. #MakeCongressWorkAgain — David Perdue (@sendavidperdue) September 18, 2018 Some Republicans wanted the President to force a shutdown showdown at the end of this month over money for his border wall, but GOP leaders in the Congress advised against that, worried it would boomerang against the GOP before the elections. Budget watchdog groups denounced the approval of these two spending bills, arguing the Congress is doing little about the deficit, which already stands at nearly $900 billion for 2018. “It completely ignores the trillion dollar annual and perpetual deficits that are fast approaching,” the Club for Growth said in a statement calling on Senators to reject the plan. But few listened, as the Senate voted 93 to 7 in favor of the plan.
  • Americans will soon be able to try Heinz’s latest creation -- Mayochup. The ketchup company introduced the combination in Arab Gulf states earlier this year, but after being prodded to bring the product to U.S. store shelves, the company has decided to give its customers what they want and bring it to America.  All it took was a half million votes in favor (or is it flavor?) to bring the ketchup/mayo hybrid to the U.S., Esquire reported. But the question looms, what city should be able to get the first official taste? Heinz is running a poll on its Twitter page to find out. But the clock is ticking. Votes via hashtag end at 11:59 p.m. CST Tuesday. >> Read more trending news  >>Read: Heinz introduces Mayochup, mayonnaise-ketchup combo, so when will you be able to find it? “After seeing the unprecedented passion surrounding this product, including the nearly one million votes on social media and 500,000 votes in favor of bringing it stateside, launching Mayochup in the U.S. was a no-brainer,” Nicole Kulwicki, director of marketing at Heinz, told the “Today” show in a statement.