ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day
58°
Partly Cloudy
H 79° L 66°
  • cloudy-day
    58°
    Current Conditions
    Partly Cloudy. H 79° L 66°
  • cloudy-day
    74°
    Evening
    Partly Cloudy. H 79° L 66°
  • cloudy-day
    68°
    Morning
    Cloudy. H 78° L 54°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

National Govt & Politics
Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email
Close

Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email

Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email
Photo Credit: Mark Wilson
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (L) and Patrick Kennedy (R) under secretary for managment State Department, participate in a town hall meeting at the State Department July 10, 2009 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email

A top State Department official offered the FBI a "quid pro quo" in exchange for unclassifying one of Hillary Clinton's emails amid a probe into the former secretary of state's use of a private email server, according to documents released Monday by federal investigators.

>> Read more trending stories

The allegation was detailed in notes from an interview that took place in July 2015 with an unnamed official in the FBI's Records Management Division.

"(Redacted) received a call from (redacted) of the International Operations Division (IOD) of the FBI, who 'pressured' him to change the classified email to unclassified. (Redacted) indicated he had been contacted by PATRICK KENNEDY, Undersecretary of State, who had asked his assistance in altering the email's classification in exchange for a 'quid pro quo,'" according to the interview notes.

"(Redacted) advised that, in exchange for marking the email unclassified, STATE would reciprocate by allowing the FBI to place more Agents in countries where they were presently forbidden."

>> Related: WikiLeaks emails: Trump questions whether DOJ, Clinton 'colluded' on email probe

The call was allegedly made as authorities reviewed five of Clinton's emails in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

At a later all-agency meeting, "a participant specifically asked whether any of the emails in question were classified. Making eye contact with (redacted) KENNEDY remarked 'Well, we'll see,'" according to the interview notes.

The interviewee believed the comment was in reference to the email Kennedy, who is not related to the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, was attempting to get unclassified.

Kennedy argued for unclassifying the email during a 15-minute exchange at the meeting, although authorities declined to change its status. Kennedy asked to speak with someone else about the classification and was referred to Michael Steinbach, assistant director of the Counter-Terrorism Division.

>> Related: WikiLeaks emails: Apologies Clinton's 'Achilles' heel,' adviser says

During a subsequent conference call, "KENNEDY continued to pressure the FBI to change the classified markings on the email to unclassified. STEINBACH refused to do so," the interview notes state.

The interview subject told investigators that he "believes STATE has an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON emails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON."

In a statement released to Politico, State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner denied that State officials requested a "quid pro quo" from federal investigators.

"This allegation is inaccurate and does not align with the facts," he said.

"To be clear: the State Department did upgrade the document at the request of the FBI when we released it back in May 2015. Under Secretary Kennedy sought to understand the FBI's process for withholding certain information from public release. As has been reported, there have been discussions within the interagency on issues of classification. Classification is an art, not a science, and individuals with classification authority sometimes have different views."

However, another interviewee appeared to corroborate the initial report in an interview with the FBI in September 2015.

The unnamed official, who works for the FBI's International Operations Division, said he found a note on his desk in late May or early June that asked him to contact Kennedy. The official said he was surprised, because his colleagues had been trying to get in touch of Kennedy for months, without success.

>> Related: FBI: No charges recommended in Clinton email investigation, Clinton responds

"When (redacted) returned KENNEDY's call, KENNEDY asked (redacted's) assistance in changing a classification of FBI information contained in an e-mail," according to interview notes.

"KENNEDY told (redacted) that the FBI's classification of the e-mail in question caused problems for KENNEDY and KENNEDY wanted to classify the document as 'B9.' KENNEDY further stated that the 'B9' classification would allow him to archive the document in the basement of DoS never to be seen again. (Redacted) was not sure of what KENNEDY meant by a 'B9' classification."

The interviewee told investigators that the email was classified by the FBI's Counter-Terrorism Division and related to the 2012 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

He initially agreed to look into the email's classification "if KENNEDY would provide authority concerning the FBI's request to increase its personnel in Iraq." It was later determined that the email could not be declassified.

>> Related: Fact-checking Hillary Clinton: Did FBI director say Clinton was 'truthful' about emails?

House Speaker Paul Ryan pointed to the newly released documents as evidence of Clinton's "complete disregard for properly handling classified information."

"A senior State Department official's attempt to pressure the FBI to hide the extent of this mishandling bears all the signs of a cover-up," he said.

In a Tweet, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump called the allegation "unbelievable."

The documents released Monday comprise the fourth batch of documents released by the FBI in relation to its investigation into Clinton's private email server. In all, authorities have released more than 250 pages of documents related to the email probe.

>> Related: Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton: If I were president, 'you'd be in jail'

Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, served as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. Her use of a private email server has been a recurring campaign issue; critics point to her use of an unsecured server as evidence of her questionable judgment.

In July, FBI director James Comey said no charges should be filed against Clinton because, despite her "extremely careless" handling of potentially sensitive information, no "clear evidence" existed to show Clinton intended to break the law.

Trump has promised that, if elected, he will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton's emails.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • The bloody tragedy that befell north Tulsa in 1921 has largely been ignored, even covered up, for decades. But as U.S. Senator James Lankford has pointed out, in 2021 the entire country will look at Tulsa and remember what some call the “race riot,” while others prefer the term “race massacre.” “The entire country’s gonna pause, and is gonna look at Tulsa a hundred years later, and to say ‘you had major race issues in 1921, is it better now in 2021?’ That is not an unreasonable question for the nation to ask,” Lankford told KRMG last week after a town hall meeting in north Tulsa. Also at that town hall was State Senator Kevin Matthews, who was in Washington, D.C. this week to meet with Sen. Lankford and discuss the upcoming centennial. “Senator Lankford and I want to be leaders in showing people that across party lines, across cultural lines, political and geographical lines, we can come together and tell this story, and turn that tragedy into triumph for us all,” Matthews told KRMG Thursday. He sees the centennial as an opportunity not just for discussing racial reconciliation, but also for helping develop the Greenwood area economically. “Young people would be able to participate by having t-shirts, and the other things that people would buy,” Matthews said. “Entertainment, food, restaurants, all of those things that come with tourism. It could be a spark for entrepreneurism and business.” He urges anyone interested in getting involved in the commemoration of the 1921 tragedy to visit the Tulsa Race Riot Centennial Commission web page.
  • The GOP push for a major tax reform bill in Congress took an important step forward on Thursday night, as the Senate approved a Republican budget outline for 2018, authorizing work on a tax reform bill that cannot be derailed by a filibuster, as President Donald Trump urged Congress to move quickly on a tax package. “Tonight we completed the first step to replacing our broken tax code,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. The Senate vote was 51-49, with only Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) breaking ranks, as he voted against the plan, saying he was standing up for “fiscal responsibility.” The vote was welcome news at the White House. “I will tell you, our country needs tax cuts,” the President said at the White House on Thursday afternoon, arguing tax relief would spur new economic growth in the United States on a large scale. “If we get this done, it will be historic,” the President said. “It will be bigger than any plan ever approved or – ever. It will be the biggest tax cuts in the history of our country.” President Trump: 'I think we have the votes for the budget' https://t.co/ZxIn3XEXMh — CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) October 19, 2017 That point was repeated on almost an endless loop by GOP Senators during Senate debate on the budget outline for 2018. “This is the first step to getting us to pro-growth tax reform,” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX). “It’s been more than 30 years since we reformed the tax code,” said Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ). “We have more preferences and loopholes and deductions than we know what to do with.” “If we don’t get that done, then I don’t think we have another opportunity to pass a tax bill in the next four years,” said Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO). “This budget allows us to cut taxes,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), as few Senators dwelled on the fact that the GOP plan would allow their party’s tax plan to create $1.5 trillion in extra deficits over 10 years. 'Lower taxes and better jobs are good things for Americans.' – @SenJohnThune #TaxReform pic.twitter.com/cCv8k1HtQl — Senate Republicans (@SenateGOP) October 20, 2017 For some, that wasn’t enough. “We should cut everyone’s taxes, to make sure we cut taxes for the middle class,” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who offered an amendment to allow for deficits to go up by $2.5 trillion over ten years. Paul’s change was soundly defeated on a vote of 93-7. While Republicans rallied around the budget plan, critics of President Trump denounced it during Senate debate, in no uncertain terms. “This is not a bad budget bill, this is a horrific budget bill,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Republicans’ budget is not a bad bill. It’s a horrific bill. — Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) October 20, 2017 GOP Congressional leaders must still sort out the differences between the budget outlines approved in the House and Senate, before starting on their effort for the first major tax reform plan since 1986. Some late changes made in the plan by Senate Republicans could pave the way for the House to simply accept the Senate version of the budget as early as next week, which would speed up the effort to begin debate on tax reform. As of now, the fine print of the GOP tax reform package remain a secret. Republicans want that to change in the next few weeks.
  • We may not rank very well on a lot of recent lists, but Oklahomans are hard workers. So says WalletHub, which ranked Oklahoma City 21 and Tulsa 25 out of 116 metro areas on the hard work scale. The biggest factor is, what else, the number of hours worked per week. But Oklahoma's ranking was hurt a little by labor force participation rate, which is only average here compared to the rest of the nation. Tell us what you think. Are Oklahomans hard workers? And how many hours do you think people should work per week? Send us an open mic on the KRMG app. You can see more about the list here.
  • U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was the keynote speaker Thursday during a meeting of the Oklahoma Sheriff's Association in Midwest City. Sessions voiced concern over efforts to reduce federal sentences and cited statistics showing a recent increase in violent crime nationwide.  He says Oklahoma's murder rate jumped 40 percent from 2014 to 2016, while the number of overdose deaths in Oklahoma spiked by nearly 70 percent over the last decade. “These tired, tough on crime tactics do nothing to serve the interests of Oklahoma,” said Ryan Kiesel, Executive Director at ACLU of Oklahoma  The head of the Oklahoma Sheriff's Association and some Republican lawmakers, who spoke at the event vowed to oppose legislative efforts next year to reduce certain criminal penalties.
  • As a key U.S. Senator said again on Wednesday that the Trump Administration was not being forthcoming about an ambush that killed four U.S. soldiers in the African nation of Niger, the Secretary of Defense told reporters that an investigation is ongoing into the October 4 incident, which military officials believe was linked to a group that is backed by the Islamic State. “We do not have all the accurate information yet,” Secretary of Defense James Mattis told reporters at a Pentagon photo op. “We will release it as rapidly as we get it.” Little has been said in public by either defense officials or the White House about the Niger incident, where a small group of U.S. Army soldiers were believed to have been ambushed by fighters who are linked to the Islamic State. “The loss of our troops is under investigation,” Mattis said as he defended the lack of official details in public. “We in the Department of Defense like to know what we are talking about, before we talk.” MOMENTS AGO: Defense Secretary Mattis speaks out on #Niger. pic.twitter.com/nGEXVoJnZl — Fox News (@FoxNews) October 19, 2017 Monday was the first time that President Trump had commented about the attack in Niger; when asked about his silence, Mr. Trump instead talked about how he had written letters and called military families, seemingly raising questions about how his predecessors had handled similar situations. The President did not say anything about the specifics of the attack; instead, the White House has become focused on a fight over what Mr. Trump said to the widow of one of the soldiers, and how it was interpreted by family members, and Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-FL), who is close to the family. On Capitol Hill, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, again said that little information had been given to members of Congress about the attack, making clear his frustration at the lack of details. “It may require a subpoena,” McCain said on Thursday. McCain has already threatened to slow down work some Pentagon nominees to get the attention of military leaders, so they will provide more information about the Niger situation, and he made clear that he has sent that message to the Defense Secretary. McCain said earlier he’s disappointed in how Mattis has handled the Niger situation. “I’ve told him so,” McCain said. — Emma Loop (@LoopEmma) October 19, 2017 Reporter: Is the Trump administration being up front about what happened in Niger? 'No,' McCain said, per @KilloughCNN — Manu Raju (@mkraju) October 18, 2017 This morning, McCain expressed his frustration with the Trump Administration on another front, after the White House did not send a witness to a Senate hearing on defending against cyber attacks. “We’re going to have to demand a better cooperation and better teamwork than we are getting now,” McCain said at a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. It wasn’t clear if McCain would hold hearings on the Niger incident, as Democrats started to publicly ask questions as well. The @realDonaldTrump Administration still has not adequately explained what happened in #Niger nor why US troops are in that country. https://t.co/KYhlc8vTDK — Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) October 19, 2017