ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day Created with Sketch.
78°
Sct Thunderstorms
H 89° L 72°
  • cloudy-day Created with Sketch.
    78°
    Current Conditions
    Sct Thunderstorms. H 89° L 72°
  • partly-cloudy-tstorms-day Created with Sketch.
    85°
    Afternoon
    Sct Thunderstorms. H 89° L 72°
  • rain-day Created with Sketch.
    79°
    Evening
    Showers. H 88° L 63°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

National Govt & Politics
Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email
Close

Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email

Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email
Photo Credit: Mark Wilson
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (L) and Patrick Kennedy (R) under secretary for managment State Department, participate in a town hall meeting at the State Department July 10, 2009 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Clinton emails: State official accused of offering FBI 'quid pro quo' to unclassify email

A top State Department official offered the FBI a "quid pro quo" in exchange for unclassifying one of Hillary Clinton's emails amid a probe into the former secretary of state's use of a private email server, according to documents released Monday by federal investigators.

>> Read more trending stories

The allegation was detailed in notes from an interview that took place in July 2015 with an unnamed official in the FBI's Records Management Division.

"(Redacted) received a call from (redacted) of the International Operations Division (IOD) of the FBI, who 'pressured' him to change the classified email to unclassified. (Redacted) indicated he had been contacted by PATRICK KENNEDY, Undersecretary of State, who had asked his assistance in altering the email's classification in exchange for a 'quid pro quo,'" according to the interview notes.

"(Redacted) advised that, in exchange for marking the email unclassified, STATE would reciprocate by allowing the FBI to place more Agents in countries where they were presently forbidden."

>> Related: WikiLeaks emails: Trump questions whether DOJ, Clinton 'colluded' on email probe

The call was allegedly made as authorities reviewed five of Clinton's emails in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

At a later all-agency meeting, "a participant specifically asked whether any of the emails in question were classified. Making eye contact with (redacted) KENNEDY remarked 'Well, we'll see,'" according to the interview notes.

The interviewee believed the comment was in reference to the email Kennedy, who is not related to the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, was attempting to get unclassified.

Kennedy argued for unclassifying the email during a 15-minute exchange at the meeting, although authorities declined to change its status. Kennedy asked to speak with someone else about the classification and was referred to Michael Steinbach, assistant director of the Counter-Terrorism Division.

>> Related: WikiLeaks emails: Apologies Clinton's 'Achilles' heel,' adviser says

During a subsequent conference call, "KENNEDY continued to pressure the FBI to change the classified markings on the email to unclassified. STEINBACH refused to do so," the interview notes state.

The interview subject told investigators that he "believes STATE has an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON emails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON."

In a statement released to Politico, State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner denied that State officials requested a "quid pro quo" from federal investigators.

"This allegation is inaccurate and does not align with the facts," he said.

"To be clear: the State Department did upgrade the document at the request of the FBI when we released it back in May 2015. Under Secretary Kennedy sought to understand the FBI's process for withholding certain information from public release. As has been reported, there have been discussions within the interagency on issues of classification. Classification is an art, not a science, and individuals with classification authority sometimes have different views."

However, another interviewee appeared to corroborate the initial report in an interview with the FBI in September 2015.

The unnamed official, who works for the FBI's International Operations Division, said he found a note on his desk in late May or early June that asked him to contact Kennedy. The official said he was surprised, because his colleagues had been trying to get in touch of Kennedy for months, without success.

>> Related: FBI: No charges recommended in Clinton email investigation, Clinton responds

"When (redacted) returned KENNEDY's call, KENNEDY asked (redacted's) assistance in changing a classification of FBI information contained in an e-mail," according to interview notes.

"KENNEDY told (redacted) that the FBI's classification of the e-mail in question caused problems for KENNEDY and KENNEDY wanted to classify the document as 'B9.' KENNEDY further stated that the 'B9' classification would allow him to archive the document in the basement of DoS never to be seen again. (Redacted) was not sure of what KENNEDY meant by a 'B9' classification."

The interviewee told investigators that the email was classified by the FBI's Counter-Terrorism Division and related to the 2012 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.

He initially agreed to look into the email's classification "if KENNEDY would provide authority concerning the FBI's request to increase its personnel in Iraq." It was later determined that the email could not be declassified.

>> Related: Fact-checking Hillary Clinton: Did FBI director say Clinton was 'truthful' about emails?

House Speaker Paul Ryan pointed to the newly released documents as evidence of Clinton's "complete disregard for properly handling classified information."

"A senior State Department official's attempt to pressure the FBI to hide the extent of this mishandling bears all the signs of a cover-up," he said.

In a Tweet, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump called the allegation "unbelievable."

The documents released Monday comprise the fourth batch of documents released by the FBI in relation to its investigation into Clinton's private email server. In all, authorities have released more than 250 pages of documents related to the email probe.

>> Related: Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton: If I were president, 'you'd be in jail'

Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, served as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. Her use of a private email server has been a recurring campaign issue; critics point to her use of an unsecured server as evidence of her questionable judgment.

In July, FBI director James Comey said no charges should be filed against Clinton because, despite her "extremely careless" handling of potentially sensitive information, no "clear evidence" existed to show Clinton intended to break the law.

Trump has promised that, if elected, he will appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton's emails.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • An 18-year old Broken Arrow shooting victim may be paralyzed from a gunshot to the neck. He is hospitalized, but his name has not been released. One of the suspects, Noah Robinson Wayne McCarty, has surrendered, but police are still looking for 18-year old Noah Alexander Herndon. Both men are suspects in the shooting and beating of the victim at the Greens Apartments Wednesday night following an argument earlier. If you have information, call Broken Arrow police at 918-259-8400.
  • With the public release on Thursday of an updated health care bill from Senate Republicans, the focus on Capitol Hill quickly shifted from what is in the measure to how many votes the GOP could muster, as separate groups of moderates and conservatives expressed concern about some of the details, even as the Senate Majority Leader was aiming to hold a vote late next week. Here’s some of the back story on who is not on board in the Senate: 1. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) – A negotiator on the fence. Cruz was one of the 13 GOP Senators who spent weeks behind closed doors trying to forge a deal on health care. But when the plan was publicly released, the Texas Republican was not supporting the plan, as he stressed that the bill was just a “draft,” saying the GOP plan “does not do nearly enough to lower premiums. That should be the central issue for Republicans – repealing Obamacare and making healthcare more affordable.” Cruz as of now says, “I cannot support it as currently drafted, and I do not believe it has the votes to pass the Senate.” Straying from Texas Republicans, Ted Cruz opposes GOP health care bill https://t.co/GoJTYN3vT2 — Austin Now (@Austin_CP) June 23, 2017 2. Along with Cruz – Lee, Paul and Johnson. Three other more conservative Republicans also expressed public reservations about the plan, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI). Hours after the bill was made public, the four of them issued a joint statement, which indicated they were ready to keep negotiating for a better deal: “Currently, for a variety of reasons, we are not ready to vote for this bill, but we are open to negotiation and obtaining more information before it is brought to the floor. There are provisions in this draft that represent an improvement to our current healthcare system but it does not appear this draft as written will accomplish the most important promise that we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and lower their healthcare costs.” The most outspoken of this foursome has been Paul. Will this health care bill pass? 'Not in its existing form,' Sen. Rand Paul says https://t.co/ksy8fbfsty https://t.co/KP4uyeycla — CNN (@CNN) June 22, 2017 3. Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME): Waiting on the CBO. On the other side of the Republican coin, more moderate GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine indicated that she liked some of the provisions in the new draft bill, and said she was open to supporting it. But she told reporters who mobbed her just off the Senate floor that she would not commit to voting for the new Republican health measure until she has seen the review by the Congressional Budget Office that is expected out early next week. “I’m still reviewing the text of the bill,” Collins said. “I very much want to see the CBO assessment.” Sen Collins: “I cannot support a bill that is going to result in tens of millions of people losing their health insurance” via @MeetThePress pic.twitter.com/LCMuqBNU8C — Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) June 22, 2017 4. From the heartland – worries about opiod funding. One vote to watch is that of Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio, who has made no bones about his concerns that Medicaid funding to the states is being restricted too much by GOP plans, especially when it comes to funding for programs to deal with the opiod crisis. Portman made clear he likes some of the changes in the bill “to reduce premiums in the individual insurance market, but I continue to have real concerns about the Medicaid policies in this bill, especially those that impact drug treatment at a time when Ohio is facing an opioid epidemic.” Like Cruz, Portman helped develop this bill, but he’s not voting for it – yet. Sen Portman (who was on health care working group) says he has 'real concerns about the Medicaid policies in this bill' –> pic.twitter.com/s3Ioj1SrMF — Frank Thorp V (@frankthorp) June 22, 2017 5. Two very important votes from Alaska. The way that the GOP health plan impacts health care in The Last Frontier could play a big role in how this bill does in the Senate. While Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) is seen as a more likely vote for the Republican plan, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) has repeatedly made clear her concerns with how the numbers get crunched for Alaska taxpayers. Murkowski said she will work with officials back in her state to analyze the new GOP bill. One other hangup for her is how the bill blocks money for Planned Parenthood, a move that’s been opposed both by Murkowski and Sen. Susan Collins. Just asked Murkowski about defunding @PPFA. 'I support Planned Parenthood.' The bill defunds it for a year. 'I do not support defunding.' — Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) June 22, 2017 6. Others say they’re “studying” the bill. A number of reports added more names to the list of possible GOP opponents, but I’m not so sold on them being the deciding vote against the plan. These names include Dean Heller of Nevada, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, Corey Gardner of Colorado, Jeff Flake of Arizona, and Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia. For several of them, especially Capitol and Heller, the issue of Medicaid funding is a big deal in this bill. The problem for Republicans is that if you ease up on spending restrictions to Medicaid, then you probably lose some conservatives because of that. GOP leaders hope to find a sweet spot in between. “I have serious concerns about the bill’s impact on the Nevadans who depend on Medicaid,” Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., said. #NoTrumpcare — fuzionbunny (@fuzionbunny) June 22, 2017 7. Does the GOP bill pass the Jimmy Kimmel test? Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) has talked a lot about devising a health care plan that where “no family should be denied medical care, emergency or otherwise, because they can’t afford it” – something that caught fire after late night TV host Jimmy Kimmel told of his child’s medical troubles. Cassidy was part of the group that designed the GOP plan, and while some people see him as a fence-sitter, he seemed to be giving some good signs about his feelings on the bill, telling Fox News on Thursday evening that the plan would push insurance premiums down. 8. Does this pass? Can the Senate get the job done? While this blog has shown there are a number of GOP Senators who might have issues with the health care bill, will they really not support the plan if it comes to a vote next week? That’s the million dollar question right now. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has made clear that he wants to force a vote – but he has also left the door open for legislative changes to the plan in coming days. Congressional leaders don’t usually roll the dice on major legislation. We’ll see in coming days if McConnell can muster the votes to pass this plan before lawmakers go home for the July Fourth break. Does Leader McConnell have 50 votes for these ideas? https://t.co/6KcRjkf3Ke — John R Parkinson (@jparkABC) June 22, 2017
  • You can bet that one ISIS fighter, never saw it coming. Business Insider says, according to the Globe and Mail, a Canadian sniper took out the fighter with a shot from more than two MILES away. If the report is accurate, the shot would be a record-breaker, by far. The current confirmed record is 1.54 miles by a British sniper. There's plenty of skepticism from other snipers about this new report, but others concede that with the kind of rifle and optics that were used, it's theoretically possible. You can read more about the report here.
  • Police hope the public can help them track down the man they say murdered his estranged wife outside her Tulsa home early Thursday morning. Homicide Det. Dave Walker says they believe Jose Gomez Baca shot and killed Elizabeth Rodriguez shortly after she arrived home about 1:30 a.m. near Admiral and Memorial in an ambush-style attack. Family members of the victim were in the home, including her brother, Gilberto Rodriguez. “I was in my room, my brother woke me up and told me that my sister was dying outside,” Rodriguez told KRMG news partner FOX23. “I came outside and she was in the car dying. My mom was holding her, she died in my mom’s hands.” Sobbing, he couldn’t continue the interview. Police say Gomez Baca is armed with a handgun and a shotgun, should be considered extremely dangerous, and should not be approached. He’s believed to be driving a Gray, 2004 Dodge Ram pickup truck, with Oklahoma tag 146 QAO. Anyone spotting him or the vehicle is urged to call 911.
  • Almost six weeks after he suggested on Twitter that he might have “tapes” of conversations with former FBI Director James Comey, President Donald Trump on Thursday acknowledged that he “did not make” and does “not have” any such recordings, which had drawn interest from lawmakers in Congress. “James Comey better hope that there are no “tapes” of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!” the President tweeted just three days after firing Comey last month. But in a pair of tweets on Thursday afternoon, Mr. Trump said if there are tapes, he doesn’t have them. …whether there are 'tapes' or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 22, 2017 The question of whether there were “tapes” of conversations between the President and Comey had roiled the Congress, and the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 elections. Asked about it during his testimony earlier this month before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Comey said, “Lordy, I hope there are tapes,” as he said it would be fine to release them to the public. Several committees in Congress had asked for the tapes as well. Comey: “Release all the tapes. I’m good with it.” https://t.co/FbmTfZFI1g — NBC News (@NBCNews) June 8, 2017 The White House had for weeks refused to directly answer questions about whether the President had a taping system that he used in the Oval Office, and if he did, whether it had recorded conversations with Comey. The President had plenty of opportunities before today to say there were no tapes; at a joint news conference with the leader of Romania earlier this month, Mr. Trump sidestepped a direct answer about tapes, and simply promised to let reporters know his answer in the future. “I’m not hinting about anything,” the President said, saying he would let reporters know the answer “in a short period of time.”