ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day
80°
Mostly Cloudy
H 94° L 76°
  • cloudy-day
    80°
    Current Conditions
    Mostly Cloudy. H 94° L 76°
  • cloudy-day
    89°
    Afternoon
    Mostly Cloudy. H 94° L 76°
  • clear-day
    89°
    Evening
    Mostly Sunny. H 94° L 72°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

Local
OSU professor: US sliding badly in terms of economic freedom
Close

OSU professor: US sliding badly in terms of economic freedom

OSU professor: US sliding badly in terms of economic freedom

OSU professor: US sliding badly in terms of economic freedom

In the latest ranking of countries based on economic freedom by the Fraser Institute, the United States has fallen lower than ever.

Fifteen years ago, the U.S. ranked second, behind Hong Kong.

But overregulation, civil asset forfeiture, eminent domain, and other factors have combined to make the country much less business-friendly, according to Per Bylund of Oklahoma State University.

Bylund is Records-Johnston Professor of Free Enterprise and Asst. Professor in the School of Entrepreneurship at OSU.

He tells KRMG he's blowing the whistle to draw attention to what he sees as major obstacles to economic growth and freedom in the country, but admits there are few easy solutions.

"The problem is not only that we're doing worse compared to other countries, but that we're actually doing worse, objectively speaking, compared to 15 years ago," he said Tuesday.

"There is more regulation. There is undermining of property rights quite a bit through asset forfeiture and eminent domain, where the government steps in to basically take private property and give it to private businesses because the government thinks it's a better use of this property."

He told KRMG that in terms of economic freedom, Oklahoma actually ranks fairly high.

"The problem is we're one of the top sailors on a sinking ship," he said. "I think it's better to be a mediocre sailor on a ship that floats and has plenty of wind... really, the federal government is taking us down with it."

He did note that while Oklahoma has low personal income taxes and a low government debt burden, it does have some issues to tackle.

"Compared to other states, we have a very bloated government in terms of staff numbers compared to the private sector, for instance," he said. "We have a corporate tax that is far higher than Texas and Colorado for instance, and it is at par basically with Missouri and Arkansas. And that corporate tax is a big problem for business and for job creation in the future, simply because the government is taking the profit from these companies, profit that they could use otherwise to expand their businesses, and employ more people, and innovate."

Still, Oklahoma's problems pale with the issues at the federal level, Bylund says, and he's not optimistic about easy solutions.

"I'm blowing the whistle on this, more than advocating anything specifically. What I can do as a researcher and professor is really shed light on what's going on, and what research tells us this is going to lead (sic), and undermining property rights for instance - we know that this could have a disastrous effect on society, especially on economic growth, and the whole country's wellbeing in the future, simply because we're undermining how the market works, how the economy works, and that means it's going to have a terrrible effect probably on jobs, on new businesses and so forth, and I think it's my responsibility as a scholar to share my knowledge on this."

CLICK HERE to read the Fraser Institute's Economic Freedom of the World 2015 Annual Report.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • As Republicans try to push ahead with a new plan to overhaul the Obama health law, one flash point has erupted on how the GOP effort would impact people with pre-existing health conditions, as backers and opponents have come to much different conclusions on that important policy matter. The issue of how people with pre-existing conditions are treated has been a controversial one throughout this year’s legislative push by the GOP to coalesce behind a plan that would repeal and replace the Obama health law, as supporters of the law argue it’s one of the most popular aspects of the existing law, as it prevents insurance companies from discriminating against people because of their past medical history. In a tweet sent out on Wednesday evening, President Donald Trump declared his strong support for the Graham-Cassidy plan, specifically trumpeting what he says is ‘coverage of pre-existing conditions.’ I would not sign Graham-Cassidy if it did not include coverage of pre-existing conditions. It does! A great Bill. Repeal & Replace. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 20, 2017 Senator (Doctor) Bill Cassidy is a class act who really cares about people and their Health(care), he doesn't lie-just wants to help people! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 21, 2017 As for what’s in the actual proposal from Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) – the language does not expressly say that people with pre-existing conditions can keep their coverage without facing premium increases, as under the Obama health law. And the bill text doesn’t expressly say that states can get rid of requirements to cover pre-existing conditions, either – but it leaves open that possibility. Here is the only mention in the legislative text about pre-existing conditions: The Graham-Cassidy plan would allow states to change the “Essential Health Benefits” that are required under the Obama health law – basically, these are items that must be included in health coverage by insurance companies, preventing higher premiums based on age, lifetime caps on medical coverage, and the refusal to cover certain items because of a pre-existing medical condition, and more. Under the plan, states would be allowed to seek a waiver from the Secretary of Health and Human Services to change the EHB’s for that state; some states might want to keep the current Essential Health Benefits, while others could seek something different in terms of minimum coverage requirements. Some outside groups, and insurance companies have said their read of the language is that coverage for pre-existing conditions would be in danger in the Graham-Cassidy plan. Trump=pre-existing conditions covered under Graham-Cassidy. Blue Cross/Blue Shield=No. What's the truth? @SenJohnThune @SenatorRounds — Debra Elofson (@debra_elofson) September 21, 2017 My insurance company says #GrahamCassidy nixes coverage for preexisting conditions https://t.co/7qadcn1Vur — Jennifer (@jenniferd0902) September 21, 2017 The current GOP plan is to have a vote on the Graham-Cassidy language sometime next week. The Senate must act before September 30 in order to use a parliamentary procedure that prevents a Senate filibuster. Senators will be back on Monday for votes – at this point, the GOP does not have 50 votes for this new plan.
  • A big hug for a California teenager whowith $1,500 inside and returned it to its rightful owner. That’s what Melissa Vang did when 18-year-old Tyler Opdyke showed up at her door to make sure she had found the lost wallet. He had hidden it under her doormat when no one answered his knock.>> Read more trending news This is how it happened. Opdyke was handing out fliers for his uncle’s pesticide business, according to KOVR, when he stumbled upon the wallet bulging with cash.  Vang’s husband had dropped it as he was leaving the home “I just really thought about what I would want someone to do if I were to drop my wallet,” Opdyke told KOVR. “And then I thought about the house. I thought about the family who lived there.” When he rang the doorbell to return the wallet, no one answered, because Vang was afraid to go to the door, but surveillance video captured Opdyke holding up the wallet . >> Related: Lost wallet returned with painfully honest letter about why thief kept cash So he hid the wallet under the doormat and returned later to make sure the family had found it. This time Vang and her two daughters answered the door. They hugged Opdyke and thanked him for his honesty and integrity in returning the lost money.
  • As Hurricane Maria was ravaging the island of Puerto Rico, House Speaker Paul Ryan said during a Wednesday visit to Florida that he expects the Congress will vote on more disaster relief money next month, as federal agencies deal with the aftermath from three major hurricanes – Harvey, Irma and Maria. “I’m sure that we’re going to do another, what we call a supplemental, sometime in October, once we have a full assessment of what is needed,” the Speaker said, after spending the day looking at storm damage across Florida. Earlier this month, lawmakers approved $15.3 billion in extra aid for Hurricane Harvey; while that money was expected to allow for initial aid for victims of both Harvey and on Hurricane Irma relief, the expected damage from Hurricane Maria will mean an even bigger drain on federal emergency budget accounts. The Speaker’s comments came after Ryan toured damaged areas in south Florida, which included a flight from the U.S. Coast Guard over the Florida Keys. Thank you @SpeakerRyan for taking the time to visit South Florida & the #FLKeys to assess the damage left behind by #Irma #KeysRecovery pic.twitter.com/qNb105UJid — Rep. Carlos Curbelo (@RepCurbelo) September 20, 2017 “From Marathon to Key West, it was really pretty extensive damage,” Ryan said, noting that he was familiar with the area from fishing trips he has made to Florida in the past. “It was really astounding, the kind of damage that is done, not just to the ecosystem, but also to the homes and the structures,” the Speaker added. Ryan was accompanied not only by local lawmakers from Florida, but also by the Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-NJ), who would be in charge of any extra aid package in the House. . @SpeakerRyan says he expects Congress will have to pass another hurricane aid package in October. — Cristina Marcos (@cimarcos) September 20, 2017 “We will work together to make sure that the necessary federal resources are in place for the rebuilding,” the Speaker said. “We will be there every step of the way.” No estimates have been given on how much the Congress will have to pony up in terms of federal aid for Harvey, Irma and Maria; the Governor of Texas at one point said he thought his state might need over $100 billion from Uncle Sam, and the costs will certainly climb with damage to Puerto Rico from Maria.
  • University of Oklahoma President David Boren says he will resign as head of the state's flagship university at the end of the current school year. Boren is a former Democratic governor and U.S. senator. He has served as OU's president since 1994. Boren announced his plan Wednesday to retire June 30, but agreed to stay longer if a successor has not been selected by that time.
  • If you have plans for Saturday, you might want to change them. Well, if you believe a new claim that says the world is going to end Sept. 23, that is. >> Read more trending news Christian publication Unsealed foretells the rapture in a four-minute YouTube video called 'September 23, 2017: You Need to See This.' Why Saturday? According to David Meade, the date is derived from verses and numerical codes in the Bible.  For example: 'Jesus lived for 33 years. The name Elohim, which is the name of God to the Jews, was mentioned 33 times (in the Bible),' Meade told The Washington Post. 'It's a very biblically significant, numerologically significant number. I'm talking astronomy. I'm talking the Bible . . . and merging the two.' Ed Stetzer, a pastor and executive director of Wheaton College's Billy Graham Center, takes issue with Meade and his claims. Read an in-depth look at how Meade came up with this doomsday date and why Stetzer disagrees with him on myajc.com