ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

cloudy-day
49°
Sunny
H 74° L 47°
  • cloudy-day
    49°
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 74° L 47°
  • clear-day
    69°
    Afternoon
    Sunny. H 74° L 47°
  • clear-night
    65°
    Evening
    Clear. H 74° L 47°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

Local
Battle brewing over Tulsa Christmas Parade
Close

Battle brewing over Tulsa Christmas Parade

Battle brewing over Tulsa Christmas Parade
Photo Credit: Russell Mills
Two parades, two locations, two names-one time

Battle brewing over Tulsa Christmas Parade

Some of the people who banded together to put on a Christmas parade in 2011 have had a falling out, and that has already led to some confusion about what will happen with this year's parade.

The parade began because many were unhappy that the annual parade downtown no longer had the word "Christmas" in its title.

Last week, members of the board of Tulsa Christmas Parade, LLC issued a statement warning people to beware of an "imposter." (See full text of that statement below)

The man, unnamed in the statement, is David Arnett, a journalist and blogger known for his involvement in local politics.

Arnett spoke with KRMG and was dismissive of the group's statement.

They "issued some kind of silly press release that was not accurate, was disingenous, and really very amateurish if not blatantly slanderous."

That said, Arnett denied reports in other Tulsa media which claimed he was preparing legal action.

"We do not plan to file any legal action whatsoever," he said.

Arnett added that he has filed for a parade permit, and said the parade will take place on Sunday, December 2.

McFarland said his group has identified a couple of possible dates for a parade, but they aren't ready to announce the date yet.

He claims that his group alone has the right to use the name "Tulsa Christmas Parade."

"Our legal counsel has advised us that we have grounds to continue using that, and to continue to promote the Tulsa Christmas Parade, and if somebody tries to do the same thing we've got legal grounds to say 'you can't do that.'"

Arnett disagrees.

"They believe that because they've spent 70 bucks on an LLC that they own Tulsa Christmas Parade. That is inaccurate," he told KRMG.

McFarland regrets the confusion likely to ensue from the competing parades.

"People need to know what they're giving to, and if they're going to give to a cause, they need to know that it's going to that cause."

Both sides indicated reconciliation is an unlikely scenario, and despite their intentions, the issue may end ultimately end up in court.

 


This is the statement issued last week by Josh McFarland:

 

Josh Mcfarland, founder and one of the organizers of the Tulsa Christmas Parade, is warning Tulsa businesses to beware of a former volunteer claiming to be organizing the parade this year.

“It is sad that someone who worked with us last year has decided to go on his own, claiming to represent the Christmas Parade, which he has no legal authority to do so,” said McFarland.

“We’ve even had reports that this person has already solicited and in one case collected money from a business” continued McFarland.  “And we need to let the Tulsa business community know who exactly is running the Tulsa Christmas Parade.”

McFarland explained that members of the Tulsa Christmas Parade board are seeking a legal remedy to stop the actions of the former volunteer.

“However, we felt the need to let the public know before anyone else gives money to this person instead of to the Christmas Parade,” said McFarland.  McFarland encourages any businesses who have been contacted by someone saying they are from the Tulsa Christmas Parade to contact him at 918-706-6787 immediately.

The Tulsa Christmas Parade is made up of a three person board that wanted to give Tulsan's the option of attending a Christmas Parade after the dismantling of the name "Christmas" in the former downtown parade. Last year 100% of the remaining proceeds were gifted to the Love Heals Veteran"s Recovery Center, a shelter for substance abusive veterans. Josh McFarland, Mark Croucher, and Eddie Huff are the members of the The Tulsa Christmas Parade board.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • Days before an explosive 60 Minutes story on a bill that seemingly gutted the DEA’s ability to curb the nation’s opioid epidemic, Senator James Lankford was in Tulsa for a town hall meeting at which he addressed the problem of opioids at length. He showed the audience of a map that showed the explosion of opioid-related deaths in the country between the years 2011 to 2015. Most of the central time zone was fairly white, but one state jumped out because it was nearly filled with red - Oklahoma. “It’s not about wealth and poverty, it’s not about one county or another,” Lankford told the audience. “You can look at that map of Oklahoma and see it’s across the state - rural, urban, suburban, it’s everywhere.” He pointed out that Congress had passed a bill about 18 months ago to address the issue, but clearly, there’s a lot of work to be done. And lawmakers alone, he said, can’t solve the problem. “I’m going to ask us to have family conversations to say ‘why? Why is this a bigger problem in opioids in our state, and not in the states around us?’” He did sound a couple of hopeful notes. He and some of his fellow senators lobbied to end the practice of requiring hospitals to prove all their patients were “pain free” on discharge in order to get full compensation from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Also, he said, thirty pharmaceutical companies are now working together and sharing research to develop pain relievers that are not addictive.
  • Even as President Donald Trump urged Senators on Monday to find a bipartisan deal on short-term fixes to the Obama health law, the consensus among health insurance experts is that Mr. Trump’s decision last week to no longer make payments to insurance companies to cover the health-related costs of some Americans might actually cost the federal government billions more in the years ahead. At issue is the “Cost Sharing Reduction” payments that had been made by the Obama and Trump Administrations – that money helps subsidize insurance costs of some consumers in the Obamacare exchanges. Those payments were never expressly approved by the Congress, leading many Republicans to charge that the spending had been illegal, and spurring the President to block the payments. And that’s where the subject gets a bit complicated. “The Congressional Budget Office estimated that not funding CSR would lead to a net increase of $194 billion in more spending over the next decade,” said health care researcher David Anderson of Duke University. Repealing CSR could increase federal deficit. No CSR = Higher Premiums = Higher APTC = increased federal deficit. https://t.co/NPWFjAKGUw — Thomas Tsai (@Thomasctsai) October 13, 2017 But wait – how would halting an expected $10 billion in payments in 2018, a move that would save Uncle Sam money – how would that lead to such a big cost for the feds over the next decade? “While the federal government would save money by not making CSR payments, it would face increased costs for tax credits that subsidize premiums for marketplace enrollees with incomes 100-400% of the poverty level,” wrote officials of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which focuses on health care policy matters. In other words, different subsidies doled out under the Obama health law would go up as insurance companies raise premiums to deal with the loss of the CSR federal payments – those are known as “Advance Premium Tax Credits,” which can go to families of four with a yearly income of up to $97,000. Who Bears the Brunt With the End of ACA Cost-Sharing Subsidy Payments? https://t.co/pMhUQwvpeC by @larry_levitt — Kaiser Family Found (@KaiserFamFound) October 16, 2017 “The biggest effect from the termination of cost-sharing subsidy payments is that premiums are going up to offset the loss,” said Larry Levitt of Kaiser, who labeled the impact of the Trump CSR decision, “confusing and complicated.” One example of that started to appear on Monday in in Pennsylvania, as state officials said health coverage “rates will increase by an average 30.6 percent in the individual market ,” instead of by 7.6 percent. One recent story from the Miami Herald found that the Trump move on CSR payments would mean a big increase for Florida in the amount of federal dollars spent to subsidize those who get their health insurance through the Obamacare exchanges in that state. Some experts argue that Mr. Trump’s decision will have the biggest negative impact on insurance rates in states that are normally in the Republican column – especially if those states did not move to expand the Medicaid program during the Obama Administration. In recent months, a bipartisan group of Senators had been working to figure out a way to tinker with the Obama health law, and make sure the CSR payments were made by Congress, led by Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who told reporters on Monday evening that he had already spoken with the President about his CSR decision. Alexander on his call with TRUMP: 'He said 'I don't want people to suffer.' Those are his words.' — Peter Sullivan (@PeterSullivan4) October 16, 2017 Some GOP Senators have grumbled in recent weeks about the talks between Alexander and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), worried that it will contain little in the way of concessions by Democrats on the operations of the Obama health law. That’s a concern for Republicans in the House as well, and could lead to a stalemate in Congress on any short-term effort to deal with the Obama health law. “At this time, in my opinion, doing nothing is an acceptable outcome for liberal policy preferences while doing nothing moves policy further away from stated conservative policy preferences,” said Anderson of Duke University. “I want to get healthcare that’s much more affordable and much better healthcare, and that’s what we’re doing,” the President said on Monday when asked about the CSR payments decision. What that exactly means for the President is still not clear.
  • Careful with that 'one-click ordering' on Amazon. You might accidentally order a HOUSE. PopSugar.com came across a company on Amazon that modifies shipping containers into a fully-functional, fully furnished 360-square foot house. It comes complete with heat and AC, a kitchenette with appliances, and a bathroom with toilet, shower, and sink. If you've got the land, you can buy the house for $36,000. But if you’re really interested, do your homework on local zoning laws. Some online reviews caution that some towns and cities don’t allow the container houses. You can read more about the story here.
  • DeBarr Avenue is named after Edwin DeBarr, a former University of Oklahoma professor and KKK grand dragon.  The Oklahoman reports that the university's student government association passed a resolution last month to support efforts to rename DeBarr Avenue.  Norman City Councilwoman Breea Clark also posted an online petition in March asking residents to help change the name.  DeBarr was one of the first professors at the University.   He became a KKK grand dragon while at the school and was forced out in 1923 because of his Klan involvement.   The university also removed Debarr's name from one of its buildings.    
  • With a lot of work still needed in Congress on key items of President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda, Mr. Trump met for lunch on Monday with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, giving off no signs of any ill will despite some sparring in the past, as both men vowed to push ahead on plans for major tax cuts and reform, emphasizing the need to get that done by the end of 2017. “We’re fighting for the same thing – we’re fight for lower taxes, big tax cuts – the biggest tax cuts in the history of our nation,” the President said at a hastily assembled meeting with reporters in the White House Rose Garden. “I want to underscore what the President said – we have the same agenda,” McConnell said, standing next to the President the entire time, as reporters verbally jostled to get his attention during a somewhat raucous Q&A that had not been on the original schedule for Mr. Trump. “My relationship with this gentleman is outstanding,” Mr. Trump said of McConnell, not mentioning some of his tough statements and tough tweets about the Senate GOP leader in the past. Here is the full Trump news conference, with McConnell: