H 60° L 32°
  • clear-day
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 60° L 32°
  • clear-day
    Sunny. H 60° L 32°
  • clear-night
    Clear. H 60° L 32°

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00


Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00


Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

Court rules Los Angeles sheriff violated immigrants' rights

A federal judge ruled that the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and immigration officials violated the rights of suspected immigrants who were detained after they should have been released from jail.

Judge Andre Birotte Jr. ruled Thursday in U.S. District Court that immigrants were held too long, denied bail or were locked up despite a lack of evidence.

The ruling came in a pair of class-action cases that were combined because they involve the use of immigration detainers issued by the federal government to hold suspected illegal immigrants up to 48 hours after they are to be released from jail so immigration agents can pick them up for deportation.

"It is an important precedent for the rest of the country where the law enforcement agencies are still honoring detainers," said attorney Jennie Pasquarella of the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

Birotte found the Sheriff's Department violated the detainees' Fourth Amendment rights against illegal search and seizures, which also protects against arbitrary arrests.

"Officers did not have probable cause that the individuals were involved in criminal activity, but were instead holding these individuals on the basis of civil immigration detainers," Birotte wrote. "Officers have no authority to arrest individuals for civil immigration offenses."

In a couple instances, the suspects being held were U.S. citizens.

California has since passed laws barring local law enforcement from honoring detainer requests, but the ruling affects thousands of people who were held by the nation's largest Sheriff's Department between 2010 and 2014 and could be eligible for monetary damages.

Los Angeles County, and many other California counties, stopped honoring immigration detainers after a federal court ruling in Oregon on the issue.

"This is another court joining the chorus and saying, these things are illegal, and this is the first time it happened on a class-wide basis," Pasquarella said.

The court also found that the Sheriff's Department was unfairly holding immigrants who should have been eligible for low bail amounts because they had detainers.

A sheriff's spokeswoman said the lawsuit filed in 2012 involved past practices.

"The Sheriff's Department does not detain any inmate beyond their normal release date regardless of whether or not there is a valid ICE detainer," said Nicole Nishida. "This has been the standard practice since 2014."

In the case against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Birotte found that federal agents couldn't issue a detainer for an arrestee solely because the person was born in another country and lacked an immigration file in federal databases.

An ICE facility in Southern California issued detainers for that reason, which could affect U.S. citizens born overseas and people whose cases had typographical or other errors, in addition to foreigners who entered the country illegally, Pasquarella said.

Immigrant advocates had been seeking a ruling that would find all detainers unconstitutional that were based on database searches because they are unreliable, said Jessica Bansal, litigation director at the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. Birotte said that issue would need to be resolved at trial.

One witness in the case for ICE testified that about a third of database searches returned incorrect information.

"That wasn't the only problem with the databases, but that's the one that their witness offered up," Bansal said. "I wouldn't use a database that is wrong three out of 10 times to throw someone in jail."

Other issues that need to be resolved at a trial or further hearings include cases of immigrants subject to higher bail amounts and the basis for other detainers issued by the federal immigration agency.

A spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said the agency doesn't comment on pending litigation.


Taxin reported from Santa Ana, California. AP writer Michael Balsamo contributed to this report.

Read More

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • The recent rain in Tulsa County has done more than just saturate the area. Drivers in Tulsa tell us they've noticed a lot more potholes pop up. “You almost have to dodge them a lot of times, which puts you in a lot of trouble getting in the way of other traffic,” one driver said.   Police in Broken Arrow report the same thing has happened along Lynn Lane. One resident states the problem has always been there, but now it's even worse. “It’s just really bad because of the rain,” that resident said.   She adds the new potholes have made her family’s daily drive a little more difficult. Let us know where the worst potholes can be found in Tulsa County.  
  • The ground will be a bit soggy, but today should be perfect for outdoor activities. National Weather Service says the recent rain will move out of the Tulsa area. “Sunday will be mostly sunny with highs in the lower 60”s,” NWS said.   Conditions will remain dry Sunday night.  NWS is reporting mostly clear skies and a low around 30 degrees.   There is some good news weather wise for the upcoming work week.  The Tulsa area should see highs in the 60’s through Thursday.  
  • President Donald Trump lobbed verbal barbs at his critics in Congress on Saturday night, blasting a rebuttal intelligence memo issued by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee about the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, Democrats said the new details showed the FBI had done nothing wrong in its probe of Russian influence that had tentacles reaching to people in Mr. Trump’s orbit. “FBI and DOJ officials did not “abuse” the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process, omit material information, or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump campaign,” the Democratic memo states. Republicans had the exact opposite view, both parties as both sides made claims and counter charges about what was in – or not in the memo – on the Russia probe. Let’s look a little further into the details. 1. Trump says Democratic memo proves no collusion. On Twitter, and in a telephone call to Fox News on Saturday evening, it didn’t take long for the President to make clear a familiar refrain, that the Democratic intelligence review had nothing in it to worry him, as he again claimed that the FBI had engaged in biased actions in the investigation related to the Russia probe. “The Democrat memo response on government surveillance abuses is a total political and legal BUST,” Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter. “Just confirms all of the terrible things that were done. SO ILLEGAL!” But on the actions of the FBI, the Democratic details seemed to paint a different picture from the President’s declaration. President @realDonaldTrump: ' @BarackObama was the president during all of this meddling or whatever you want to call it with Russians and others possibly…he's the one that was supposed to take care of this, and he didn't.' pic.twitter.com/C06fwfh7zF — Fox News (@FoxNews) February 25, 2018 2. First, take a few minutes to read the Democratic memo. Don’t take anyone’s word for what’s in the 10 page rebuttal from the House Intelligence Committee minority members, go ahead and read it yourself. The bottom line from the Democrats was simple, the FBI did nothing wrong, and the Republicans had put out a memo that didn’t tell the full story. “After reviewing the memorandum drafted by committee Republicans that was made public at the beginning of this month, the FBI rightly expressed its ‘grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy,'” Democrats stated, as they countered that the FBI did nothing wrong in the investigation of former Trump Campaign adviser Carter Page. It was a much different review than what came from the GOP side. Also, here is a link to the GOP response. 3. Democrats reinforce the time line of the GOP memo. When it comes to actions of former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele – the author of the much ballyhooed Steele Dossier about Russian links to President Trump, it remains clear that whatever information Steele provided to the FBI, that “dossier” material was not what started the investigation by the FBI. As the Republican memo stated – and the Democratic memo repeats – the overall Russia counterintelligence investigation began at the end of July 2016 following information obtained from Trump foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos, with a FISA warrant being sought against one time adviser Carter Page only after he left the Trump Campaign. 4. What did the FBI tell the FISA court about Christopher Steele? In the GOP memo, Republicans said the FBI never revealed that Steele was being paid for opposition research by a law firm with direct ties to the Democratic National Committee and therefore basically by Hillary Clinton’s campaign – making the charge that political machinations had caused the investigation of Carter Page. “Mr. Schiff’s memo does not disprove that politically funded documents were used as evidence in court,” said Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH). But the Democratic memo does give much more context about what the court was told with regards to Steele, saying that his research had been ‘commissioned by “political actors” to ‘obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.'” 5. There was much more going on than the FISA on Carter Page. While no one knows for sure what was redacted in this Democratic memo, it’s obvious from the blacked out portions in relation to Carter Page that Page had long been on the radar of U.S. Intelligence, well before President Trump’s campaign began in 2015. Democrats say that the FISA surveillance of Page – who had already left the Trump Campaign when it was approved in October of 2016 – netted other important intelligence for the FBI. “The Court-approved surveillance of Page allowed FBI to collect valuable intelligence,” the Democratic memo states. What that was, isn’t clear – but the FISA surveillance was approved three additional times by the FISA court. 6. An active Russia probe vs the Clinton emails. When you think back about what the FBI was doing in the headlines in the weeks before November of 2016, most of the attention was on the Hillary Clinton email investigation, as then FBI Director James Comey dramatically re-opened the Clinton probe in late October, roiling the campaign. But as pieces of the Mueller investigation and this Democratic memo demonstrate, the FBI at the same time was actively investigating seemingly as many as four people with ties to the Trump Campaign – before the election. As I look back on my stories from the last six weeks of the campaign, Russia was not what the FBI was publicly focused upon. It raises some interesting questions. The new House Intel memo makes it even MORE baffling that FBI went out of its way to make public Clinton investigation while staying silent about Russian operation aiding Trump. They knew—and they kept it from us. — Garrett M. Graff (@vermontgmg) February 24, 2018 7. No matter the dueling memos, the probe continues. While issuing public memos from each party on the House Intelligence Committee is not exactly the way that you probably want to conduct a Congressional investigation, it’s obvious that much more consequential work on Russian interference into the 2016 election continues on both the Senate Intelligence Committee, and in the Special Counsel’s office. And there is still a review of how the matter was run by the FBI, undertaken by the Inspector General of the Justice Department. Publicly, we know of three guilty pleas as part of plea bargains involving members of the Trump Campaign. In federal court here in D.C., there are a number of sealed criminal cases which were filed about the same time as other actions by the Special Counsel. Are those cases related to this investigation? That’s not clear. But the story isn’t done.
  • Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee on Saturday released their redacted response to a Republican memo on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, as Democrats charged that the GOP omitted numerous details about the FBI’s probe during the campaign for the White House. “FBI and DOJ officials did not “abuse” the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process, omit material information, or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump campaign,” the Democratic memo states. “The FBI supplied information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that Russia might be colluding with Trump campaign associates,” Democrats said in a press statement announcing the release of the memo, which had been held back earlier this month after the White House raised questions about details included in the ten page memo. “Some time ago, Republicans on our committee released a declassified memo that omitted and distorted key facts in order to mislead the public and impugn the integrity of the FBI,” said Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence panel. “We can now tell you what they left out,” Schiff added. BREAKING: Congress releases redacted Democratic memo pushing back on GOP claims of surveillance abuses in FBI's Russia probe. — AP Politics (@AP_Politics) February 24, 2018 Democrats said their rebuttal “should put to rest any concerns that the American people might have as to the conduct of the FBI, the Justice Department and the FISC,” as they said the evidence “failed to uncover any evidence of illegal, unethical, or unprofessional behavior by law enforcement.” Democrats not only countered that, but raised questions about the testimony of one-time Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page, who was the focus of the original Republican memo, as the GOP raised questions about how surveillance had been approved of Page. Democrats said the answer was not the information supplied by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele. Some portions of the document on those points were blacked out, or redacted. You can read the full Democratic memo at this link. Democrats also released a fact sheet to go with the memo.
  • Local districts have been dealing with a lot of school threats recently. In fact, at least four children have been arrested. Tulsa County Assistant District Attorney Erik Grayless has a warning for anyone thinking about making a threat of their own. “If you threaten a school, we will prosecute you,” Grayless said.   The district attorney's office is so serious about these threats that Grayless was willing to get even more specific. “You cannot post pictures of firearms on Instagram and reference your school,” Grayless said.  “That’s a threat.  The threat itself, regardless of your intentions, is a crime.” KRMG's told that alone could lead to a misdemeanor charge and six months of jail time.