ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

clear-day
77°
Sunny
H 96° L 72°
  • clear-day
    77°
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 96° L 72°
  • clear-day
    92°
    Evening
    Sunny. H 96° L 72°
  • cloudy-day
    73°
    Morning
    Mostly Cloudy. H 90° L 69°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

Fewer patients awake during operations

Being aware of what's going on during an operation under general anesthesia sounds scary. The good news is a new study suggests it happens less often than had been thought.

Previous research has found that about 1 in 500 patients is aware or awake under general anaesthesia. The new report, from the U.K.'s Royal College of Anaesthetists, finds it is far less common, about 1 case in 15,000.

Researchers also found that even where brain monitoring equipment is available, fewer than 2% of anesthesiologists routinely use it to check the effectiveness of the anesthetic.

Anaesthesia Study

The findings come from the biggest study of its kind. It surveyed 7,125 anesthesiologists and coordinators at 329 hospitals across the U.K.

There were 153 cases of "accidental awareness" reported in 2011:

  • 30% happened during surgery.
  • 23% happened after surgery but before the full recovery time.
  • 47% happened after anesthesia has begun but before surgery had started.

Awareness during surgery was more likely to lead to pain or distress.

"Waking up during surgery is a fear," says researcher Jaideep Pandit, DPhil, a consultant anaesthetist at Oxford University Hospitals in the U.K. "It's a legitimate fear."

He hopes the study will calm some concerns: "Anything to use data to be reassuring is always a good thing."

He admits some under-reporting is possible in the study. Anesthesiologists may have forgotten how many awareness cases they'd seen. Since anesthesiologists don't routinely see patients after operations, they may not always learn about the awareness report. Sometimes patients may forget the incident or think it is too trivial to mention.

From Terrified to Interested

How do patients describe the experience of being aware during an operation? These vary greatly, from "the very, very severe adverse experiences of a combination of pain, paralysis, terror," Pandit says, to anecdotal reports of patients almost being fascinated by what's happening around them: "Completely unconcerned and untroubled and almost interested in the proceedings."

He and colleagues are planning more research to focus on patient experiences. "Even for someone who reports they are not particularly bothered by it, at the very least it must be surprising for them."

Brain Monitors

Brain monitoring systems have been in use the U.K. for about 10 years. The monitors help check that a patient really is under the anesthetic. Pandit says these are available in about two-thirds of hospitals, but even where they are supplied, most anesthesiologists don’t use them. "One would have hoped that if the profession is doing what it wants to do, which is keep people asleep, and there is a monitor that they believe in, that they would of course use it."

There's a debate over how useful the monitors are, and some research suggests they don't appear to help lessen the numbers of people being awake during surgery.

Different Responses to Anesthetic

Pandit says it isn’t clear why some people wake up during a procedure while others don't, although it is possible the drugs used for anesthesia have a different effect on different people. "We know that's true of other drugs. Be it antidepressants or cardiovascular drugs or cancer drugs. They don’t all have the same effect in people," he says. "Some people get side effects and some people don't."

SOURCES: Pandit, J. Anaesthesia, published online March 12, 2013.Jaideep Pandit, DPhil, consultant anaesthetist, Oxford University Hospitals, U.K.

© 2013 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.

Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • A pregnant woman driving an SUV reportedly chased down a suspected purse thief and struck him with her vehicle in a Walmart parking lot in Asheville, North Carolina – and it was all caught on video. >> Watch the video here According to WLOS-TV, Christine Braswell, 26, confronted the man Wednesday afternoon after he allegedly grabbed her purse and other items from her SUV.  >> Body found in locked Walmart bathroom that employees assumed was out of order for days 'He was with my purse and he took off and I took off after him,' Braswell told WLOS. 'Me being five months pregnant, I chased a little ways then come back, jumped in the car, threw it in gear and come across the curb and ran him over. I was not going to let him get away with it. It's not right; it's not fair.' >> Read more trending news Police said the suspect, Robert Raines, was treated for minor injuries and faces felony charges of breaking and entering, larceny and property damage. Braswell also faces a misdemeanor charge of assault with a deadly weapon, WLOS reported. Read more here.
  • A woman choked her dog to death because she was tired of the dog biting her.  A Monroe County Sheriff's statement says 61-year-old Alice Evans told deputies on Saturday that the dog named Big John had bitten her on the hand the previous night. She was arrested Tuesday on a felony charge of cruelty to animals.   The arrest report says Evans told investigators she choked the dog with his collar and buried him in the backyard. The report says the wound on Evans hand was 'no larger than a pencil eraser.'   The deputy dug up the dog's body and took it to a veterinarian for a necropsy, which confirmed the cause of death to be strangulation.   Jail records don't list an attorney for Evans.
  • A video stunt gone wrong leaves a woman charged in the fatal shooting of her boyfriend.   Monalisa Perez, of Halstad, was charged Wednesday with second-degree manslaughter in the death of Pedro Ruiz III.   A criminal complaint says the 19-year-old Perez told authorities Ruiz wanted to make a YouTube video of her shooting a bullet into a book he was holding against his chest. She says she fired from about a foot away.   Authorities say Ruiz died from a single gunshot wound to the chest.   The victim's aunt, Claudia Ruiz, tells WDAY-TV that the couple played pranks and put them on YouTube.   Perez was granted a public defender and released on $7,000 bail.   The charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
  • A stolen car has four flat tires after a police chase.   The owner had chased after his car on foot after it was stolen near 800 South Quaker Avenue around 12:45 a.m. Thursday. Tulsa police arrived and took over. TPD Sergeant Joe Gimble tells KRMG that officers “pursued the vehicle until the vehicle crashed out over at First and Frankfort.” But the chase wasn't over. “Two occupants took off. One went east and the other one went west.” A police canine caught the driver, 32-year old Derek Jacobson, but his passenger is still at large.
  • In October of last year, TFD Chief Ray Driskell had a meeting with a captain who recorded the conversation. Capt. Nick Gillespie had been disciplined for an incident in which he was photographed sitting down in a ladder bucket during an incident. It was apparently not the first time Chief Driskell had to meet with Capt. Gillespie, and he clearly wasn’t happy about the circumstances. What followed can only be described as a no-holds barred, profanity-laced dressing down of an employee. It’s unclear whether Driskell knew he was being recorded, though he says early on that the discussion should remain inside that room. It didn’t, and after Gillespie was busted down from captain to firefighter, he went to arbitration and his attorney, Joel LaCourse, released the recording to the media. They also requested an investigation into Driskell’s treatment of Gillespie, and whether Driskell needed a CLEET certification in order to carry a firearm. Earlier this week, Mayor G. T. Bynum issued a statement in which he said the investigation by his office did not result in any disciplinary action against Driskell, and that the city attorney had previously issued an opinion that the chief didn’t need a CLEET certification. But the mayor’s statement did not directly address concerns over the language or tenor of the conversation between Driskell and Gillespie. Earlier this week, Fire Fighters Local 176 voted to hold a vote of no confidence concerning the chief. LaCourse tells KRMG that in the meantime, his client’s arbitration over his demotion will continue. They’re still considering whether any other legal action can or should be taken. He expressed his appreciation for the mayor’s willingness to investigate Driskell’s conduct, but admitted he was disappointed in the outcome. “Chief Driskell’s conduct towards Captain Gillespie was unequivocally inappropriate. He was berating him, he used substantial profanity and vulgarity that wouldn’t be tolerated within any other department within the city of Tulsa,” LaCourse said. KRMG has requested an interview with Chief Driskell, but so far he has declined.