ON AIR NOW

LISTEN NOW

Weather

clear-day
77°
Sunny
H 96° L 73°
  • clear-day
    77°
    Current Conditions
    Sunny. H 96° L 73°
  • clear-day
    92°
    Evening
    Sunny. H 96° L 73°
  • cloudy-day
    74°
    Morning
    Mostly Cloudy. H 90° L 69°
LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg news on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg traffic on demand

00:00 | 00:00

LISTEN
PAUSE
ERROR

Krmg weather on demand

00:00 | 00:00

Is overdraft protection a good idea?

With car insurance, life insurance, identity theft protection and travel insurance, there are as many ways to protect your finances as there are to mess them up. When it comes to banking, consumers can sign up for overdraft protection to insure against overdrawing an account. But for responsible money managers, is it worth it? We checked in with experts to find out the pros and cons of overdraft protection.

On the surface, overdraft protection sounds like a great idea — if you’re making a purchase with your debit card and you don’t have sufficient funds in the bank, your bank will automatically transfer funds from a linked account (such as a savings account) to cover the purchase.

Consumers can avoid being embarrassed in the check-out line, but they can also rack up some hefty fees — anywhere from $10 to $35, according to a survey by Bankrate.com. 

READ: How can single parents make ends meet?

“The old adage ‘prevention is better than cure,’ comes to mind when the subject turns to overdraft protection,” says Niall Wells, CEO of online budgeting tool Planwise. “But for many small businesses or low income earners, overdraft protection can prove more effective than the fees from the bank.”

And while the fees usually aren’t horrible, they can add up if you make a habit of overdrawing your account. Bank of America and Chase both charge $10 every time they have to transfer funds into your checking account. At Wells Fargo, overdraft protection fees are $12 if the amount needed is $50 or less — but that fee jumps to $20 if the amount exceeds $50.

Although most people have overdraft protection set up to transfer funds from a savings account into a checking account when an overdraft occurs, a business account or a joint account shared with a spouse or parent will also work. But even more important than choosing which account to link is reading the fine print — even with overdraft protection, you can still be charged an overdraft fee if you run out of funds in your back-up account.

READ: Six steps to a great financial plan

“If you do choose overdraft protection, ensure you have messaging services (either email or text) from your bank to alert you to the overdraft to avoid high interest fees that may be assessed,” says Wells.

Your bank can alert you if you’re getting close to running out of money in all your accounts.

“Technology can certainly be your strongest ally when you maintain a low account balance and process numerous transactions,” Wells says. “In short, overdraft protection is useful if you can manage it, but prevention by managing your balance is always better.”

Andrew Schrage, founder and CEO of personal finance blog MoneyCrashers.com, says that overdraft protection isn’t necessary for people who have no trouble managing their money.

“I don't think you need overdraft protection,” Schrage says. “If you don't opt-in for such a service and you attempt a transaction for which you don't have sufficient funds, then the purchase will simply be declined.”

Infographic: What our favorite TV homes are worth

In most cases, overdraft protection is a service for those who can't manage their own finances effectively, or those who are concerned about the embarrassment of a declined transaction, Schrage says, adding that he would rather have a transaction denied than be forced to pay a fee for the purchase to go through.

“Ultimately, overdraft protection allows people to spend more than they have, which is not a cycle one should get into,” he explains. “Furthermore, if you simply remain aware of your bank balance, overdraft protection becomes essentially useless and an excessive fee.”

For most consumers, there’s no need to link your checking account to your savings account, Schrage says. It’s possible to institute your own “overdraft protection.”

“For instance, make a deposit of $100 into your checking account, but do not record it on your transaction register where you balance your checkbook,” he explains. “That way, you have a built-in cushion of extra funds that you are not taking into consideration when you make your spending decisions. This strategy has worked well for me in the past when I've made purchasing mistakes, but have been covered by my financial cushion.”

---

A Breakdown of overdraft protection’s pros and cons from Claes Bell, an analyst at Bankrate.com:

Pros:

  • No need to worry about being embarrassed at the check-out line. As long as there are sufficient funds in your linked account, you’ll be covered for the price of the bank fee.
  • In emergency situations like running out of gas or getting a flat tire, you’ll be guaranteed enough money to get yourself home or cover the cost of the repairs.
  • If money is tight between paychecks, you’ll have enough funds to get you through till the next payday.

Cons:

  • Fees can add up quickly.
  • If you do end up overdrafting your main account as well as your back-up account, you could be liable for hefty fees.
  • Overdraft fees are assessed on a per-day basis. If your bank charges fees of $10 per day, you could be looking at a hefty $70 charge at the end of a week of overdrafting.
Read More
VIEW COMMENTS

There are no comments yet. Be the first to post your thoughts. or Register.

  • A pregnant woman driving an SUV reportedly chased down a suspected purse thief and struck him with her vehicle in a Walmart parking lot in Asheville, North Carolina – and it was all caught on video. >> Watch the video here According to WLOS-TV, Christine Braswell, 26, confronted the man Wednesday afternoon after he allegedly grabbed her purse and other items from her SUV.  >> Body found in locked Walmart bathroom that employees assumed was out of order for days 'He was with my purse and he took off and I took off after him,' Braswell told WLOS. 'Me being five months pregnant, I chased a little ways then come back, jumped in the car, threw it in gear and come across the curb and ran him over. I was not going to let him get away with it. It's not right; it's not fair.' >> Read more trending news Police said the suspect, Robert Raines, was treated for minor injuries and faces felony charges of breaking and entering, larceny and property damage. Braswell also faces a misdemeanor charge of assault with a deadly weapon, WLOS reported. Read more here.
  • A woman choked her dog to death because she was tired of the dog biting her.  A Monroe County Sheriff's statement says 61-year-old Alice Evans told deputies on Saturday that the dog named Big John had bitten her on the hand the previous night. She was arrested Tuesday on a felony charge of cruelty to animals.   The arrest report says Evans told investigators she choked the dog with his collar and buried him in the backyard. The report says the wound on Evans hand was 'no larger than a pencil eraser.'   The deputy dug up the dog's body and took it to a veterinarian for a necropsy, which confirmed the cause of death to be strangulation.   Jail records don't list an attorney for Evans.
  • A video stunt gone wrong leaves a woman charged in the fatal shooting of her boyfriend.   Monalisa Perez, of Halstad, was charged Wednesday with second-degree manslaughter in the death of Pedro Ruiz III.   A criminal complaint says the 19-year-old Perez told authorities Ruiz wanted to make a YouTube video of her shooting a bullet into a book he was holding against his chest. She says she fired from about a foot away.   Authorities say Ruiz died from a single gunshot wound to the chest.   The victim's aunt, Claudia Ruiz, tells WDAY-TV that the couple played pranks and put them on YouTube.   Perez was granted a public defender and released on $7,000 bail.   The charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.
  • A stolen car has four flat tires after a police chase.   The owner had chased after his car on foot after it was stolen near 800 South Quaker Avenue around 12:45 a.m. Thursday. Tulsa police arrived and took over. TPD Sergeant Joe Gimble tells KRMG that officers “pursued the vehicle until the vehicle crashed out over at First and Frankfort.” But the chase wasn't over. “Two occupants took off. One went east and the other one went west.” A police canine caught the driver, 32-year old Derek Jacobson, but his passenger is still at large.
  • In October of last year, TFD Chief Ray Driskell had a meeting with a captain who recorded the conversation. Capt. Nick Gillespie had been disciplined for an incident in which he was photographed sitting down in a ladder bucket during an incident. It was apparently not the first time Chief Driskell had to meet with Capt. Gillespie, and he clearly wasn’t happy about the circumstances. What followed can only be described as a no-holds barred, profanity-laced dressing down of an employee. It’s unclear whether Driskell knew he was being recorded, though he says early on that the discussion should remain inside that room. It didn’t, and after Gillespie was busted down from captain to firefighter, he went to arbitration and his attorney, Joel LaCourse, released the recording to the media. They also requested an investigation into Driskell’s treatment of Gillespie, and whether Driskell needed a CLEET certification in order to carry a firearm. Earlier this week, Mayor G. T. Bynum issued a statement in which he said the investigation by his office did not result in any disciplinary action against Driskell, and that the city attorney had previously issued an opinion that the chief didn’t need a CLEET certification. But the mayor’s statement did not directly address concerns over the language or tenor of the conversation between Driskell and Gillespie. Earlier this week, Fire Fighters Local 176 voted to hold a vote of no confidence concerning the chief. LaCourse tells KRMG that in the meantime, his client’s arbitration over his demotion will continue. They’re still considering whether any other legal action can or should be taken. He expressed his appreciation for the mayor’s willingness to investigate Driskell’s conduct, but admitted he was disappointed in the outcome. “Chief Driskell’s conduct towards Captain Gillespie was unequivocally inappropriate. He was berating him, he used substantial profanity and vulgarity that wouldn’t be tolerated within any other department within the city of Tulsa,” LaCourse said. KRMG has requested an interview with Chief Driskell, but so far he has declined.